Service Nodes

Introduction

Service nodes form the backbone of the WalletConnect Network, serving as crucial infrastructure for persisting and managing end-to-end encrypted network messages. These nodes employ rendezvous hashing, a sophisticated method that ensures even distribution of data across the network. This approach not only enhances reliability and fault tolerance but also maintains user privacy by design - service nodes cannot decrypt or read the content of the messages they handle.

Technical Architecture

The network's architecture is built on the premise that clients may be offline for extended periods. To address this, a "mailbox" system persists messages, allowing clients to retrieve data upon reconnection. This system is underpinned by a database utilizing rendezvous hashing, a concept that has proven its scalability in modern databases including Cassandra, DynamoDB, MongoDB, and others.

The nodes are primarily constructed in Rust, chosen for its performance and safety features. For critical lower-level operations such as bloom-filters and I/O, the nodes integrate RocksDB, an industry-standard implementation maintained by Facebook/Meta. This hybrid approach leverages the strengths of custom-built solutions and battle-tested components.

Current research focuses on evolving the rendezvous hashing-based database into a fully permissionless system. The next milestone is to publish a comprehensive technical design for community review, a crucial step before implementation. In the interim, node access to the network remains permissioned to ensure stability and security.

Service Node Operators

Service Node Operators play a vital role in the WalletConnect ecosystem. Their responsibilities extend beyond mere node management to include proactive maintenance of high uptime and consistent performance optimization. The barrier to entry - staking WCT tokens - serves a dual purpose: it demonstrates the operator's commitment and aligns their interests with the network's success.

The reward structure for operators is carefully designed to promote both long-term commitment and high-quality service. Staking rewards incentivize sustained participation, while performance-based incentives, calculated using key metrics like uptime and latency, encourage continuous improvement and innovation in node operation.

Node Statuses

The WalletConnect Network implements a dynamic node status system, allowing for flexible and responsive network management:

• Active: These nodes are the workhorses of the network, directly processing user requests within their assigned region. The initial target of 15 active nodes balances network robustness with economic efficiency.

• Reserve: Operating similarly to active nodes, reserve nodes ensure network resilience. They participate in the replication process and stand ready to step into an active role when needed, maintaining a pool of qualified nodes.

• Jailed: This status serves as a temporary penalty for nodes that fail to meet performance standards. The 24-hour exclusion period provides operators time to address issues while protecting the network from underperforming nodes.

• Standby: Representing potential capacity, standby nodes have staked tokens but are not actively running. This status allows the network to scale rapidly when demand increases.

• Deactivated: This status accommodates operators who choose to cease support, ensuring an orderly exit process that protects both the operator's interests and the network's stability.

Status	Target Number
Active	15
Reserve	6
Jailed	No target
Standby	No target
Deactivated	No target

note

Target numbers are initial values and may be adjusted through governance decisions to optimize network performance and economic sustainability.

Performance Evaluation

The sophisticated performance evaluation system is a cornerstone of maintaining the WalletConnect Network's high standards. The performance coefficient $U(i,t) \in [0, 1]$ provides a nuanced measure of each node's contribution:

$\text{Performance} = (W_u \cdot U_i) \cdot (W_l \cdot L_i)$

Where $U_i$ represents uptime, $L_i$ denotes latency, and $W_u$ and $W_l$ are adjustable weights. This formula allows for fine-tuning of performance priorities as the network evolves.

Performance Verification

The transition from a permissioned to a permissionless verification system represents a key evolution in the network's maturity:

1. Permissioned Network (Phase 1):

   • Trusted oracle nodes conduct performance verification, ensuring a controlled and stable initial environment.
   • The oracle node plays a crucial role within the Network. It functions as both a data collector and a regular service operator.

2. Permissionless Network (Phase 2):

   • All nodes engage in mutual performance measurement, creating a more decentralized and robust verification system.
   • Every node pings and reports on every other node operator, replacing the need for a central oracle.
   • This distributed approach enhances the network's resilience and reduces single points of failure.

Key Transition:

• Phase 1: Trusted nodes (oracles) verify performance
• Phase 2: Every node participates in performance measurement

This phased approach allows for gradual decentralization while maintaining network integrity throughout the transition. It enables the network to start with a controlled, easily manageable system and evolve into a more decentralized, robust structure as it matures.

Slashing Mechanism

The slashing mechanism is a critical component in maintaining high network standards:

1. Performance threshold $\tau$ (where $0 < \tau < 1$) is set through governance.
2. Nodes with $U(i,t) < \tau$ trigger a slashing event.
3. The underperforming node is moved to "jailed" status and replaced by a reserve node.
4. Jailed nodes may face a reduction in staked tokens, with the percentage determined by governance.
5. After the jailing period, nodes return to standby status, with the opportunity to re-enter active service.